Business Profile

Auctioneer

Manheim Auctions

Headquarters

This business is NOT BBB Accredited.

Find BBB Accredited Businesses in Auctioneer.

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Manheim Auctions's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Customer Complaints Summary

122 total complaints in the last 3 years.
45 complaints closed in the last 12 months.

If you've experienced an issue

Submit a Complaint

The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

Initial Complaint
Date:04/10/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
Im a dealer and purchased a 2019 F250 2/26/25. It was a green light guarantee with a 4.2 CR. A new car is 5.0. The vehicle showed up with a check engine light an oil leak and 4x4 didnt work. **** driving it back to the dealership from mechanic shop that does out inspections and repairs it stalled and wouldnt start. We called a wrecker and had it delivered to our dealership. We again reached out to Manheim. They sent an inspector to verify our complaint. He was unable to complete the inspection due to the vehicle not starting. Manhime told us we had three days to deliverit to their location in *********. This was 21 April and they gave us until the 24th. We shipped it in operable to Manhiem *********. after a week in *********, they confirmed the oil leak arbitration but said they need to inspect the vehicle for tampering since it was running it was sold and returned not running. Almost 2 weeks later they notified me that it needs a starter in two batteries as it wont start. They then tell me that the vehicle has gasoline in it and thats the reason it wont run. The vehicle was sold with a a tank of fuel in it, and we would never add fuel to a vehicle with more than an eighth of a tank of fuel. they are now insinuating we cranked it when it wouldnt start and even went as far as insinuating, we added gasoline to the vehicle none which are true. We put 40 to 50 miles on the vehicle when it was delivered to us back-and-forth to the Mechanic shop and inspection. I dont believe a diesel engine will run that far on gasoline before stalling. I would assume there are a lot of people cranked it until it wouldnt crank anymore and added gasoline, assuming it was out of fuel
Business Response
Date: 04/11/2025
The 2019 **** F-250 Lariat purchased by ********** is currently pending arbitration. The outcome has not yet been determined.
Initial Complaint
Date:04/10/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I bought 2022 ****** Altima 2.5 S ***************** from Manheim **********. seller announce the airbag light and collision light repair completed. but when I received the car, the lights and codes are still on. manheim validate them after my arbitration. but manheim arbitrator surprisingly denied my arbitration. seller falsely claimed they already fixed the problems and mislead buyer, why manheim help seller and encourage the false statement ? since the problems are not fixed, seller should not claim it
Business Response
Date: 04/15/2025
Manheim ********** has concluded that the seller clearly listed and disclosed the collision avoidance issues with the vehicle. Also, during a One Guard inspection at ****************'s facility, they were unable to duplicate any transmission issues. The vehicle was clearly listed with pictures on the Condition Report showing substantial damage to the front bumper which defines Nissans reasons for the announcement. Manheim New Jersey stands firm in their decision regarding the outcome of the arbitration claim.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/28/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I purchased a 2014 ****** Crosstrek on March 6th 2025. I had paid for a post sale inspection on this vehicle and it had passed. I had paid for this vehicle to be towed from the state of Atlanta to ************* to our dealership. Our first inspection of the vehicle it had manheim arbitration stickers on the windows of this vehicle. This led to us to realize that this vehicle was already arbitrated at a manheim location and returned. During our mechanical inspection we had found some kind of silicon on the engine with a crack near trying to hide a major oil leak. The leak/ crack is on the timing cover and the valve cover gasket. We are in arbitration of this vehicle for this major engine issue. Prior to bringing this vehicle to a manheim location I had provided many photos and was told to bring the vehicle to a local manheim for inspection and that it would be approved with no question and that they would reimburse me for the transportation. I spoke with the arbitration team and they did not like the way I worded my arbitration claim and I can't arbitrate this vehicle because of this. How does a vehicle have two major engine issues and be overlooked by a *** team? I spent over a 1000 dollars having this vehicle towed all over the country and we are simply looking to arbitrate and return the vehicle for the major engine defects. Please help me with this claim and do the right thing to allow me to return this vehicle. I appreciate your help. Thank you,******* ***
Business Response
Date: 04/08/2025
Manheim Atlanta is currently having the unit sent to a ****** dealership for a third-party inspection. The results of the inspection will dictate future responses.

Customer Answer
Date: 04/14/2025

Complaint: 23127666

I am rejecting this response because: I have never been contacted by Atlanta Manheim regarding this issue. I Had paid for a tow company to drive to Manheim *********** to pick up the ****** I had purchased. When the tow company had arrived the employees at told the *** company that he vehicle was at a local ****** Dealership. On 4/8/24 I had spoke with a Manheim representative named ****** ******* and addressed my concerns. I had spent money on towing this vehicle from Atlanta to our dealership in ****** ma and then to Manheim ***********. I have received zero communication from Atlanta Manheim and Manheim of ***********. The employee ****** from Manheim new England said he would looking into reimbursing my Dry run to the auction on 4/8/25. I have emailed the following employees at Manheim Atlanta and called leaving voice messages. I have never been contacted by email or phone call since 3/15/25. This vehicle was purchased on 3/8/25. It has been over a month and this arbitration has not be settled not have I received a phone call or email back from this company. It truly is disappointing. We been doing business with Manheim auctions for almost 15 years.
Emails for employees I have contacted at the auto auction with no response.
<*********************************************>,
****************************************************,
"********************************************************"
"********************************************"

Sincerely,

******* ***
Business Response
Date: 04/15/2025
Route 110 ******** arbitrated the unit for a crack in the engine block. The inspection completed by ****** OEM found that the vehicle does not have a crack in the engine block. Route 110 ******** purchased a 7 day ********* Sale Inspection) and filed their arbitration claim outside of the 7 day coverage period. There will be no changes to the outcome of the arbitration claim.
Customer Answer
Date: 04/15/2025

Complaint: 23127666

I am rejecting this response because:

I purchased a 2014 ****** Crosstrek on March 6th 2025. I had paid for a post sale inspection on this vehicle and it had passed. I had paid for this vehicle to be towed from the state of Atlanta to ************* to our dealership. Our first inspection of the vehicle it had manheim arbitration stickers on the windows of this vehicle. This led to us to realize that this vehicle was already arbitrated at a manheim location and returned.

During our mechanical inspection we had found some kind of silicon on the engine with a crack near trying to hide a major oil leak. The leak/ crack is on the timing cover and the valve cover gasket. We are in arbitration of this vehicle for this major engine issue. Prior to bringing this vehicle to a manheim location I had provided many photos and was told to bring the vehicle to a local manheim for inspection and that it would be approved with no question and that they would reimburse me for the transportation.

I spoke with the arbitration team and they did not like the way I worded my arbitration claim and I can't arbitrate this vehicle because of this.
How does a vehicle have two major engine issues and be overlooked by a PSI team? I spent over a 1000 dollars having this vehicle towed all over the country and we are simply looking to arbitrate and return the vehicle for the major engine defects.

After I filled a BBB Claim. The auction had sent this vehicle to a local ****** dealership where they found that the vehicle needed 3400 dollars in repairs. The vehicle needs a passenger side cam carrier and timing chain and cover to be replaced. This vehicle has a major engine leak/ engine defect.

We are looking to have this vehicle settled in arbitration and looking to reambursed for the three tows for transportation of this vehicle I have paid for.

Please help me with this claim and do the right thing to allow me to return this vehicle. I appreciate your help.

Thank you,
******* ***
************

Sincerely,

******* ***
Business Response
Date: 04/16/2025
Manheim's decision remains the same regarding the outcome of the arbitration claim.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/26/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
The vehicle I am referring to is the following:2012 ****** GT-R VIN# ***************** I will also be attaching the proof here. When I purchased the vehicle it was green light with NO ! Structural damage announcement. Upon an inspector checking it at Manheim - Riverside same company as ****** (MANHEIM). He found multiple issues with the body which included substantial structural damage and bent chassis parts. I need my money refunded !!
Business Response
Date: 03/28/2025
Mr. ******* purchased the unit from Manheim Nevada and arbitrated for mechanical defects, in which he accepted a $1,000 adjustment from the seller. The vehicle was not arbitrated for structural damage. Also, once he accepted an adjustment, he is keeping the unit "AS-IS" and it cannot be arbitrated again, with the exception of title or mileage Issues. Due to Mr. ******* never arbitrating for structural damage and accepting an adjustment to keep the unit, he has no further grounds to arbitrate. The structural damage concerns were not brought to Manheim's attention until 20 days after the sale, which was well past the ******************************************************** previously opened an arbitration claim for mechanical.
In accordance with NAAA and Manheim policies, the outcome of the arbitration claim will remain the same.

Customer Answer
Date: 03/29/2025

Complaint: 23121574

I am rejecting this response because:

Why would I arbitrate for structural damage initially if I am not an expert in checking for that. This drops the value of the vehicle by ALOT !!! Structural was never mentioned and the ** was manipulated ! Even the ** writer at Manheim - Riverside said it himself: This unit should never have received a 4.3 !! Considering the damages that any ** write should be able to identify when checking the vehicle !!! If it was something small I wouldnt be arguing however when it goes from a 4.3 to a 1.3 a drop of 3 complete points is massive ! Especially with a structural damage present on a unit costing close to $60,000.00 is excessive !!! We are not talking about a cheap car here ! I will be pursuing this legally in district court considering the amount is too high to proceed in small claims !

Sincerely,

****** *******
Business Response
Date: 04/02/2025
Manheim stands behind their decision regarding the arbitration claim, and there will be no changes to the outcome of the claim.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/26/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I recently bought a vehicle from MANHEIM (3 weeks ago) the unit had a 4.3 CR and NO structural damage !! I then put it myself back into the sale and they grade it a 1.3 CR with structural damage !! Nothing was done to the car literally was even cleaned and waxed. Why is it that they added all these remarks ? Were they lying to me before just to make a sale ? If so I need my money back since structural damage was not announced or noted !!!! If not they will need to fix the *****
Business Response
Date: 03/26/2025
We will need to obtain additional information in order to be able to review the claim. Please provide the full VIN# on the vehicle that you are referring to.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/29/2025

Complaint: 23118924

I am rejecting this response because:
Business asked for the **** which is the following:
2012 ****** GT-R
**** *****************

Sincerely,

****** *******
Business Response
Date: 03/31/2025
This is a duplicate BBB Claim# 23121574. Please refer to BBB Claim# 23121574 for more information.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/13/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I bought a car 2024 Kia ***** LXS (*****************) from manheim, I find the car has structural damage and open arbitration on 3/17. I quickly drop the car to manheim branch for inspection. until today I still didn't know the status of it. I sent multiple emails to ****** and other manheim staffs, but I didn't get an answer. not sure why it takes almost one month to confirm structural damage. it is terrible delay. I ask for $2000 credit if the structural damage is confirmed
Business Response
Date: 03/17/2025
The arbitration claim on the 2024 Kia ***** LXS is still pending and has not yet been finalized.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/06/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I bought 2023 ******* Elantra SEL ***************** from manheim. upon receipt I find the apron underlying the left fender is kinked and bended. I open a structural arbitration on manheim and have the car towed to manheim ******* for inspection. manheim denied my claim and told me the fender bracket is broken although I repeatedly told them they need to open the left fender and check the underlying apron. But manheim ******* denied my request. I don't understand why manheim refuse to do it. the left fender is loose. they just need to spend 1 second lifting up the left fender and then they can clearly see the structural damage with kinked apron.
Business Response
Date: 03/07/2025
Manheim Nashville had ****************'s vehicle inspected twice at Manheim *******. On March 3rd, the unit was inspected at Manheim ******* with no structural issues found. At the request of Mr. ****** the arbitrator had the vehicle inspected once again on March 5th, and the technician found that the left fender bracket was damaged but not the apron which is not structural damage.
There will be no changes at this time regarding the outcome of Manheim Nashville's decision in reference to this claim.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/07/2025

Complaint: 23028025

I am rejecting this response because:

Sincerely,

****** *****
Business Response
Date: 03/07/2025
As stated previously, there will be no changes at this time regarding the outcome of Manheim Nashville's decision in reference to this claim.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/04/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
hi we are ******************** ******* our ACCOUNT got charge 500 for a vehicle that didn't pick up, VIN: ***************** can you tell the system that noone contact me and manheim never contact me, i never agree on this charge.a trash emploee make wrong information, ****** she said she think the vehicle is not avaiable, and she put a note and never send me any alarms and charge me at today 02 19 and when i call back to manheim she won t transfer me to any manager. i told her that it is not about the wrong information. you can not make decition for me or for the buyer. or for manheim. she really like to guess guess guess it is all about truth, the truth is the vehicle is available , and maybe the buyer do not want it or the buyer want it . it is the buyer decition, the buyer is a big ****** new car dealer. they do not even want my 500 for them at all. this trash employee just make decision for everyone and hide the information till now. and charge my company ACCOUNT. if ********************** can not fix this charge i will just claim it back.this ***** who woke at arbitration without Boundary is rediculous. she just make decision for everyone and hide the information till 02/19 and my account has been delete from auction access for half years, the system still charging it and charing unsuccessful fee again and again, this is all manheim fault and i called ******** ********** she said she is not at ********** i called ***** ********** always no answer, no reply at text message i called customer service they refuse to stop the system and ask me contact california man noone at manheim really want to be reasonable, just charing and charging this is not big company do.and i already told them clearly i refuse to pay this fee until someone want to be reasonable.but ***** even want to stop the system and talk to me
Business Response
Date: 03/05/2025
For any vehicle listed and sold on OVE and facilitated through a Manheim auction, the Seller must make the vehicle available at the listed pickup location within three (3) business days of the sale date. In addition to other arbitration remedies OVE or the Buyer may invoke, the Seller may be assessed a fee of up to $500 to compensate the Buyer for each sale not fulfilled, which fee will be passed on to the Buyer.

The Seller, in this case, ******************** did not make the vehicle available to the Buyer to pick up, therefore ******************** was assessed the $500 vehicle availability fee. Manheim California has discussed the vehicle availability policy with ******************** on several occasions, and the fee remains unpaid by the Seller.
Initial Complaint
Date:03/03/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
I had an issue with a unit I purchased on Manheim - OVE. It was announced as Green Light - Guaranteed meaning the vehicle was good as far as the drivetrain etc. initially I made a claim and opened an arbitration since when I personally went to pick up the unit myself the vehicle would not turn on, unlock nor would it respond at all. I left it at that and was then contacted by Manheim and told that the owner had got the car to charge and it was ready to go. Besides the fact that I had already driven 115+ miles the first time to pick it up I said ok I will go the following day to see if it in fact was ready to go. I arrived there and the front end of the vehicle was torn off and electrical connections exposed. It didnt sit right with me but I decided to give them the benefit of the doubt and take the vehicle. I drove home and parked it and left it at that. The next day I decide to drive the vehicle to get a car wash on it and it completely stops working and leaves me stranded. No response to the vehicles shift feature at all. This occurred on 03-01-2025 (Saturday) since I am still within the arbitration period for a vehicle bought on OVE I message the prior arbitration specialist and they failed to respond to me. Not only was I stranded but I was also in the middle of the road, unable to drive the vehicle at all nor shift into any gear due to an extremely bad failure. I provided both a picture and a video for proof. I knew this vehicle was bad since the beginning and now that caused me to be stuck and lose my entire work day and have to spend hours there waiting for a tow truck to come pick the car up and myself. This unit goes against **** guidelines (Green light announcement) and I need this unit to be refunded to me and un-wind from my account in fairness.
Business Response
Date: 03/05/2025
************************** purchased the vehicle on ******* under red light conditions, indicating that it was non-running, and had flood damage. The vehicle was not purchased as a green light unit. The vehicle was removed from the lot at Manheim ******* on February 27th, 2025, and the client opened an arbitration claim on the same day, which was 13 days later, and beyond ******* Motorsports digital protection period.

Manheim ******* has discussed the policies, rules, and regulations regarding this claim to Mr. ******* and remains firm on their decision regarding the outcome of this claim.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/10/2025

Complaint: 23011307

I am rejecting this response because:
This Is a completely different vehicle theyre referring too. This unit is a ***** Model S that was 100% announced as green light guaranteed and it was located in **********. Not sure what vehicle theyre referring too.

Sincerely,

****** *******
Business Response
Date: 03/10/2025
The arbitration claim on the 2014 Tesla Model S has been reopened by MyCentral digital auction and is still pending and unresolved at this time.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/12/2025

Complaint: 23011307

I am rejecting this response because:

This vehicle has already been returned to a Manheim location and sufficient evidence has been provided. Which includes photos and video of the mechanical failure in action. Can we get this resolved already.

Sincerely,

****** *******
Initial Complaint
Date:02/21/2025
Type:Service or Repair Issues
Status:
AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
Resolved:
The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
Unresolved:
The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
Answered:
The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
Unanswered:
The business failed to respond to the dispute.
Unpursuable:
BBB is unable to locate the business.
On 2/21/2025, I called ************** and spoke with an agent named **** with ID#******. **** advised me during our recorded call that a Vehicle Release was sent over to this company. I even asked **** to repeat himself and he stated, "a release of vehicle was sent to the company, so you can pick your vehicle up'. I then asked **** if he could state my private automobile(s) year make and model, **** stated, "2021 ***** equinox, last 4 of VIN ******. I then called the number **** gave to me, ************ and spoke with a Male named ****. **** asked me the last 6 of my VIN. **** advised me that, yes, my private automobile was on his lot located at ********************************************. I advised **** that my 2021 ***** Equinox with VIN ******, was on his lot in error as a result of larceny, grand theft auto, identity theft, etc..... I also advised **** that prior to reaching out to him I called ************** and spoke with **** and was told that a release of vehicle was sent to his company. **** then stated, "I don't have a release". I then sent an email to the general manager **** ******** at **************************** In that email I provided proof to include my ***-1 Financial Statement showing my perfected security interest in my private property and that I have superior lien for $50,000,000.00. I attached the ***-1 for NEW YORK and ***-1 for MARYLAND filed with the Secretary of State prior to 1/26/2025. In that email I demanded that my automobile be released to me not later than 2:15pm EST on 2.21.2025 or it will result in a lien being filed against this company. As of 3:40PM EST, I have not received any response from this company. This company is attempting to auction off secured property that was stolen from the secured party/Trustee on 1/23/2025 at ****************************************, my windows were rolled down with all of my personal property still inside. I have the recorded call stating a release of vehicle was sent to them.
Business Response
Date: 02/25/2025
*************************** information has been forwarded to Manheim's legal team, due to the legal nature of this claim.

Customer Answer
Date: 03/01/2025

Complaint: 22974055

I am rejecting this response because:
You are still unlawfully holding (in your lot) the 2021 ***** Equinox Vin #****** (private automobile/consumer good), that was stolen on or around 1/23/2025 and bought to your location on or around 2/17/2025, without my expressed or implied consent. The private automobile is property of a trust since May 03, 2024 to current. You are continuing to violate trust law. The trust and beneficiaries have been harmed by your actions. You are now knowingly, willfully and intentionally committing fraud and in conspiracy. The trust is also a secured party. The private automobile is registered with the Secretary of State in ********, ********, ********....The secured party ******* ******* an individual hold superior and first lien (security interest) for $100,000,000.00 (2021 ***** Equinox Vin ******), Pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement. You are stultifing the private security agreement between the secured party and ..... the agreement number is SA-SRH01131982. You are now liable for damages up to $200,000,000.00 (agricultural lien). You have been sent a Notice of Intent by email. I do not agree or accept your response. In fact I object your response. You must return the private automobile back to the Individual / Trustee ******* ******* at ****************************************************************************** within 72 hours. You can respond to this complaint with the time and date and drivers name. (UCC *****, UCC 9-102(a)(23), UCC *****, UCC 9-102(72)

Sincerely,

*******-*****: *******
Business Response
Date: 03/03/2025
As previously stated, *************************** information has been forwarded to Manheim's legal team, due to the legal nature of this claim.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/09/2025

Complaint: 22974055

I am rejecting this response because:
You have failed to comply with and you are still in violation of, to include but not limited to Maryland State Law(s), ************************* Uniform Commericial Code, Federal Laws.....
You continue to knowingly, willfully and intentional cause harm to the Trust, Beneficiaries, Secured Party, (Private Security Agreement No. SA-SRH01131982, etc. We have not been made whole. You have failed to return our property ***** ***** Equinox Vin No. 155418.
Please see the attached documents (9589 0710 5270 1418 3293 22), to include the Manufacturer Certificate of Origin....
We are further rejecting your response because you have failed to provide any information for your counsel, lawyer, representation, etc.
Provide this information.
Sincerely,

*******-*****: *******, Secured Party, Beneficiary, Authorized Representative UCC *****, ALL Rights Reserved

BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.

As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.

Cookies on BBB.org

Complaints

Customer Complaints Summary

If you've experienced an issue

Filter and sort by

Sort by

Complaint status

Complaint type

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Customer Answer

Complaint statuses

Business Response

Customer Answer

Business Response

Customer Answer

Manheim Auctions is NOT a BBB Accredited Business.